|
|
|
"Clemson
University - 3CT" Presentation:
The team relied on two screens; one used primarily for stationary graphics, the other for videos. They began by outlining the structural analysis. After the loading and boundary conditions were specified, the team explained how they arrived at the required minimum compressive composite strength. Deflection was used to quantify the results and values were given for key design parameters. The mix design process was explained and the strategy used to meet the C-33 requirementr was outlined. Then the team explained how synthetic and carbon fibers were used and how pre-stressing was done. They outlined the curing process and explained how thermo-graphic techniques were used to monitor it. The management scheme was outlined along with the statistical analysis performed to track the project. The method for selecting paddlers was outlined just before the team brought their presentation to conclusion. Judges Comments/Questions: Six people were on stage to answer the following questions:
Commentary: The presentation was very strong but there were some pretty difficult questions here. The team answered most of them well but they hesitated in some cases. Every good poker player knows that you need some luck in addition to skill to win a hand. And, even though 3CT had a good hand here, lady luck just didn't seem to cooperate during the question and answer session. But the game isn’t over until the dealing is done... and 3CT's a world class player. Product:
Canoe Name: Aces Wild Clemson went with an asymmetrical hull reinforced with three layers of polypropylene mesh. Silica fume and glass bubbles helped meet the C-33 requirement. |