|
1
|
- A Legal Minefield
- For Employers
|
|
2
|
- A favorite new employee claim
- EEOC filings up dramatically
- Included in 1/3 of all discrimination suits
- A “high risk” exposure for employers
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Protection for an employee who complains about or opposes illegal
employer activities
|
|
5
|
- Federal law
- Title VII, Civil Rights Act of
1964
- Other Civil Rights Laws – ADA, ADEA, FLSA, FMLA, OSHA
- Federal Claims Act and
Whistleblower Protection Act
- First amendment, U.S.
Constitution
|
|
6
|
- State law
- Workers’ Compensation Laws
- Whistleblower Statutes
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Statutory “right to complain”
- Focus of discussion – Title VII
|
|
7
|
- “Participation” activities
- Filing a claim with EEOC or in
court
- Assisting with EEOC or court
proceeding (providing
information or testimony)
- Advising another employee re
rights
- Narrow (covers few activities)
but deep (absolute) protection
|
|
8
|
- “Opposition” activities
- Protesting/complaining about
discrimination
- Refusing to carry out unlawful
order
- Opposition to activity of
co-worker
- Opposing discrimination outside
workplace
- Broad (covers many activities) but shallow (less absolute) protection
|
|
9
|
- EMPLOYER ACTION
- Alleged act of discrimination
- EMPLOYEE RESPONSE
|
|
10
|
- “Ultimate actions” only
- Position of several circuits
- Involves hiring, promoting, firing, determining compensation
- “Employer-friendly” position
|
|
11
|
- “Material adverse change in employment terms”
- Rule for most circuits
- May involve demotion, reprimand, negative job evaluation or reference,
refusal to grant normal benefits or office privileges, disadvantageous
transfer, harassment, countersuit
- More “employee friendly” position
|
|
12
|
- EEOC position: any action that
may deter employee from exercising rights
- Most “employee-friendly”
position
- Few courts have adopted
- Some (few) types of unfavorable treatment fall short of retaliation
|
|
13
|
- EMPLOYER ACTION
- Alleged act of discrimination
- EMPLOYER RESPONSE
- EMPLOYEE RESPONSE
- RETALIATION
|
|
14
|
- Judicial view: retaliation claim
may still succeed - “right to be wrong”
- A not infrequent outcome
- Evidentiary and “human nature” differences in two types of claims
|
|
15
|
- Applies only to “opposition” claims
- Strategy: Anticipating adverse
action, employee presses discrimination claim; then cries “retaliation”
when adverse action administered by employer
- The legal reality:
- Employee must have good faith belief that discrimination occurred; and
- This belief must be objectively reasonable
|
|
16
|
- Illegal conduct not protected
- Lawful but “objectionable” actions
- Violation of policy
- Disruptive activities
- Communication with external
parties
- Usually protected
- “Loyalty” argument by employer
- Judicial rule of
“reasonableness” applied
|
|
17
|
- The victim
- A protesting employee who is not a victim
- A protesting employee who is not in a protected class
- A protesting employee who is related to or associated with the victim
- A former employee
|
|
18
|
- Have clear anti-retaliation policy
- Inform and train work force about policy
- Follow a “zero tolerance” approach for retaliatory actions
- Understand breadth of “protected activities” and “adverse action” under
the law
|
|
19
|
- Forward all discrimination complaints to HR for proper management and
monitoring
- Handle retaliation complaint as separate grievance
- Endeavor to carry on “business as usual” in dealing with complaining
employee
|
|
20
|
- Follow common sense guidelines
- Check for unquestioned non-retaliatory reason
- Be consistent with institutional and departmental policy
- Be consistent with treatment of other employees
- Be consistent with past treatment of employee
- Scrutinize timing
|
|
21
|
- Document
- Carefully evaluate continuation of internal grievance process after
external claim filed
- Always consult HR and legal personnel
|
|
22
|
- “You cannot get ahead while you are getting even.” Dick Armey
- “Mankind must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects
revenge, aggression, and retaliation.
The foundation of such a method is love.” Martin Luther King
|