UAH FACULTY SENATE

DRAFT MINUTES OF MEETING #411

23 SEPTEMBER, 1999

PRESENT:

ADSC: Sherman

LA: Enger, Schenker, Bollinger, Meister, Waring, Hanks, Wilkerson, Williams, Bliss

ENG: Leonard, Shen, Boykin, Swain, Karr

NUR: Brookman, Hays, Cash

SCI: Christopher, Garstka, George, Li, Richards, Kunin, Miller, Comfort, Hillman

LIB: J. Warren

ABSENT WITH PROXY:

ADSC: Floyd

LBAR: Neff, Sitaraman

ENGR: Hawk, Jarem, Landrum

NUR: Warren

SCI: Lawton, Zhang

ABSENT WITHOUT PROXY:

LBAR: Dasher, McDuffie

ENGR: Abushagur, Hayes

SCI: Baird

0. President Hanks called the meeting to order at 12:40 p.m.

1. Draft Minutes of Meeting #410 were unanimously approved. Motion by J. Warren, seconded by Hays.

  1. The Faculty Senate Executive Committee Reports were accepted as presented. Motion by Bliss, seconded by Bollinger.

3. A. Senate Committee Reports:

1. Executive: The Senate Executive Committee met September 16 received Committee reports and set the agenda for the September 23 meeting.

2. Faculty and Student Development: Dr. Swain reported the Committee met with 100% attendance. The Committee discussed the plan of action for the new recreation center. The Committee will meet with the Athletic Director and survey the faculty. Dr. Swain had also contacted the President of the Staff Senate and the Staff Senate will send a representative to the meeting with the Athletic Director. Dr. Swain reminded the Senate that the Committee will depend upon them for feedback from their peers.

3. Finance and Resources: No Report.

4. Governance and Operations: Dr. Williams reported the Committee met last week. The Governance and Operations Committee and the Executive Committee have received copies of the "University Standing Committees Reference Manual". The Committee discussed the meeting regularity of the Standing Committees, or the lack thereof in some cases. The Senate Bylaws specify that the Standing Committees are required to meet at least once each semester. Some Committees have not met in quite some time and should be meeting regularly so that faculty input and flow of communication exists for faculty. There have been some recent campus decisions without oversight of the appropriate Committees. The Faculty Senate needs to look at Governance of the Standing Committees in order to insure this flow of communication and faculty input on campus actions.

5. Personnel: Dr. Garstka reported the Committee has not yet met but he has been fact-finding. The Committee was given the charge to check on some bills/resolutions passed by the Senate that have not yet been acted on at the Administrative level. These resolutions involve important issues to the faculty. Dr. Garstka reported he met with the former chair of the Personnel Committee and with Peggy and Dr. McManus. He will set a meeting of the Committee next week.

    1. Undergraduate Curriculum: Dr. Richards reported that the Committee has not met but he expects some new material to come in and he will likely set a meeting for next week.
    2. Undergraduate Scholastic Affairs: Dr. Bliss reported the Committee has not met but he has been fact-finding. There are two major issues to consider—the A, B, C, NC or the A, B, C, D, NC and the withdrawal policy. There will likely be some bills coming out of the Committee soon.
  1. University Committees: Dr. Schenker reported the Library Committee met at the beginning of the semester with the architect for the Library addition. There were some problems with the blue prints presented at that time and the architects were sent back to the drawing board. Dr. McManus added that the revised plan came out this morning and the issues have been resolved and it looks like an attractive addition to the facility. The addition will be to the south end with a great deal of glass. The facility will include computer labs and distance education facilities. Dr. McManus will make copies of the plan available to the deans soon so that they may share them with chairs and faculty.
  1. Officer Reports:
    1. Ombudsperson: The HMO loss with no replacement and thereby forcing people to go with BC/BS has some people in distress.
    2. President-Elect: No Report.
    3. President: Dr. Hanks reported the Administrative Council met a couple of weeks ago. One of the issues discussed there was consideration for raising student pay scales. This is in response to units that have students at the top end of the scale and funds to increase the pay for the students. In April the University will be looking for funding for the Internet 2. Sara Graves is the person in charge of this and the person to contact if you have any questions regarding this issue.

Dr. Hanks reported he attended the Board of Trustees meeting last week. The bulk of the meeting was devoted to the UA Institutional Presentation. UA is working on getting money for innovative curricular activities. They have a cohort of students across the state. They have a college inside the Liberal Arts College that is attracting Cambridge and Harvard students. The Board is very interested in viability. There was an issue regarding Teacher Education and preschool through 16. This is an educational mission of working together. The Legislative actions for the coming year are looking for more money to spend directly on education and revision of tax exemptions. Howard Hawk of Arab is chairing the House Committee on Appropriations. He is looking at all the non-education-related expenses in the appropriations. Hank Sanders chairs the Committee that is looking at the sales tax exemptions. They are both looking for more money to spend directly on education.

There was a question of the Board’s response to the Salary Resolution. Dr. Hanks reported the UA Faculty Senate President spent time encouraging the Board to support the resolutions and make salaries the top priority. Dr. Hanks reported the Staff Senate is considering a resolution also. He reported he would like to revise the resolution he presented to include the staff. The Staff Senate will present a resolution that will also include the faculty. He will then send a copy to the Trustees. He reported that some of the Board members were clearly sympathetic but it was unclear with others as to the extent of their support. He reported that Peter Lowe is concerned about viability and wants to change the policy that has arbitrary numbers. He feels numbers should not be the major factor considered in viability of a program.

4. President Franz Report:

Dr. Franz reported he had just come from a meeting and would be going back to his office for a conference call regarding the salary issues. He reported ACHE is presently calculating the averages based on NASULGC data. These will be non-discipline specific averages. This may not be as good for us because they will use the highest cost areas to calculate. These areas are Law, Engineering and Business. We have a disproportionate number of faculty in these areas. This will understate our problem. The other issue is that it is important to display the problem but monies should not be distributed using the same formula or based on the numbers displaying the problem. All money distributed should be put into faculty and staff salaries. Dr. Franz commended Dr. Hanks on working with the Staff Senate and including the staff in the salary issue. He emphasized that the staff are important too and the faculty and staff need to work together to accomplish the goal. Dr. Franz reported he sees the Board is very disposed to the problem and obtaining the appropriate solution.

Dr. Franz reminded the Senate of their attempts as well as some others to have some building or something named in honor of Ben Graves. A proposal was submitted to the Honorary Degrees and Naming Committee to name the North and South Loop Roads. The North Loop would be named the Ben Graves Drive and the South Loop would be named the John Wright Drive. The Board agreed. Dr. Franz was Master of Ceremony for an event on Tuesday night honoring Dr. Graves. Dr. Graves and Dr. Wright were presented a road sign and the announcement was made there to name the Loop road as Ben Graves Drive and John Wright Drive. It was very well received.

Dr. Franz was asked about his support of the Lottery. He responded his support is two-fold. He supports the lottery because it is important to the Governor and it is very good for students. In the past students were expected to graduate in four years and they did not consider going in debt for their education. Now they do not finish in four years and many go into debt to acquire the degree. Therefore the lottery will help those students and prevent them from creating great debt. Tax reform would be the ideal solution to the real problem but that is not an option at this time so the lottery is the next best thing to a step toward progressive government. The lottery will not do a great deal for UAH. There are not that many more students coming to the four-year institutions. Already most students that are going to college are staying in Alabama. There is not much elasticity. There is not a big group available to bring in. There will not be much additional revenue. Dr. Franz was asked about the possibility of freeing funds currently used for scholarships to be used to recruit outside. His response was that might be a possibility but he did not have all that information yet to know what kind of impact that might be. Dr. Franz reiterated that the lottery would mean we have to become more competitive. He also emphasized the fact that we must use the Georgia model. We must require a B average across the board with junior colleges as well as four-year institutions. He reiterated we cannot have a double standard with the four year institutions requiring a B average and the junior colleges not using that requirement. We would then have an influx of students to the junior colleges trying to keep their scholarships.

There was some discussion regarding the B average rule. Dr. Franz shared a suggestion that was made to him that the administration intends to implement because it is a very proactive and progressive approach to the scholarship and B average issue. The proposal is that if a student drops below a B then take away one-half the scholarship as opposed to taking the entire scholarship away. This applies if the student is still making progress toward the degree but has simply dropped below a B average. If the student brings the average back up then reinstate the full scholarship. Dr. Franz expressed he sees this as an excellent approach.

There was a question regarding viability and how much influence outside entities have on speaking out in favor of keeping a nonviable program. Dr. McManus addressed this question and shared there are many factors involved in making the decision regarding the viability of a program. Some of the factors included the importance of this program to the area and the community and plans for making the program viable, etc. This kind of outside support would come further down the road after other attempts and plans were exercised. There was concern expressed for the numbers used and the arbitrary choice of these numbers. Dr. McManus assured the Senate that all factors are looked at in assessing viability not just numbers.

5. Provost McManus Report:

Provost McManus reported there was a Workshop on Tuesday, September 21 with Dr. Margaret Chambers. The Workshop was about Web Teaching and Web Assisted Teaching. The morning session was for Administrators and the afternoon session was for interested faculty. Dr. Chambers looked at new and innovative ways to present the material to students who cannot make it to the campus to take the courses. Dr. McManus announced one of the things he came away from the workshop with is the knowledge that there are many faculty on our campus that are already involved in this kind of teaching and their experience and expertise would be beneficial to others across campus. He plans to have a couple of workshops using our faculty to show what they are already doing in this area. He will be contacting deans and chairs to ask who is willing to present. He also announced there will be campus resources to help faculty to do these kinds of things, with putting courses on the web or with web assisted teaching.

6. Suspension of Rules for consideration of non-agenda item.

Dr. Brookman moved, seconded by Dr. Bliss to suspend the agenda in order to consider an item not included in the agenda. Dr. Hanks announced Reva Bailey is retiring effective Spring 2000 and he would like the Senate to do a resolution recognizing her many contributions and her extensive years of service to the university. He would like someone to draft a resolution and get it done nicely to present at the next meeting. It was suggested that the resolution be developed and brought to the next meeting for review and reading. The official resolution could then be presented to Reva at a December meeting. The resolution will be reviewed at the next meeting.

Other items brought to the floor for consideration were: Consideration for extra time between classes—perhaps another 5 minutes. Students seem to have a problem with making it to their next class—especially if it is across campus with only ten minutes between the classes. Dr. Franz stated something could be modeled and brought back to the Senate for consideration. One suggestion was public transportation—a shuttle across campus. Dr. Franz responded that is a very high cost item that is not feasible at this time.

The other item brought for consideration was the fact assistantships and scholarships will not cover distance learning courses. Dr. Bliss will look into this and see what can be done.

7. President Hanks adjourned the meeting at 1:55 p.m. moved by Dr. Williams and seconded by Dr. Comfort.