HE
JOURNAL OF THE
FACULTY SENATE
VOLUME
XXV
MINUTES OF MEETING #473
APPROVED
PRESENT:
ADSC: Tseng, Schnell, Patnayakuni
LBAR: Coward, Martin, Heikes, Reeves, Marcus, Neuschatz, Colclough, Meister
ENG: Banish, Anderson, Gaede, Kulick, Karr, Lin
LIB:
NUR: Lawson, McClellan, Newman, Foote, Busby
SCI: Mecikalski, Boyd, Bishop, Paddison, Delugach, Ravindran
ABSENT WITH PROXY:
ADSC: Gramm
ENGR: Frendi
LBAR: Ferris, Bollinger
SCI: Friedman
ABSENT WITHOUT PROXY:
LBAR: Jones, Moore, Pritchard
ENGR: Frederick, Jovanov, Tippett
SCI: Weimer, Cox, Miller, Oluseyi
0.
1. Draft Minutes of Meeting Number 472 were approved. Motion by Ms. Lawson, seconded by Dr. Gaede.
2. Senate Executive Committee Reports accepted. Motion by Ms. Lawson, seconded by Dr. Mecikalski, with one abstention.
3.
Dr. Franz reported regarding the lawsuit with Nektar and Milton Harris. Dr. Franz talked about our policy and the
fact that if someone creates Intellectual Property while employed at UAH it is
the property of UAH. The policy is in
the Faculty Handbook and other places.
UAH has a generous sharing of royalties, about 40% goes to the
individual. Dr. Harris developed a polyethylene
glycol substance that would attach to the drug and help extend the time it
would work in the body. He patented this
process in 1992. A company was formed
(Shearwater) and Dr. Harris remained here until 2000. Last year Nektar, the company that had taken
over Shearwater informed us they would no longer pay the royalty fees. We filed a suit and in doing research in
preparation for that we discovered the faculty member had obtained another 20+
patents that we had not been informed of.
We found nothing to indicate that we should not have been informed of
this. It should have been
disclosed. It is our property. We had one day to respond to add the faculty
member to the suit or not. There is a
substantial amount of money involved.
Shearwater was sold to Nektar for $197M.
We have a responsibility to file the case and protect UAH’s interest. This was filed on behalf of the Board. The Board members are highly supportive. There has been mediation suggested and we
will of course try that.
Dr. Franz reported that Mr. Rieder will go around to departments to
make faculty aware of the process and policies, etc.
Dr. Franz reported that the BRAC is upon us and there are projections
of the number of people coming and the impacts.
There will be Engineering, Science, and Business vacancies. There will be some 2700 positions
affected. There is a proposal to the
Army to create co-op positions to fill the need.
The enrollment is steady. There
are some challenges in enrollment.
Nursing Enrollment is down. Visas
for International Students have created some problems.
Dr. Franz reported that Dr. Ranganath, the Computer Science Chair, has
done a great job in recruiting International Students. He went to
We also have the Japanese Consortia and have over 50 students in this
program now.
4. Dr. Radonovich’s Report.
Dr. Radonovich deferred his time to Dr. Fix to give the presentation
regarding the QEP.
5. A. Senate Committee Reports:
1. Executive: The report was distributed with the minutes. The report was approved.
2.
4. Governance and Operations:
The Committee will have Bill 305 at first reading.
5. Personnel: No Report.
6. Undergraduate Curriculum: No
Report.
7. Undergraduate Scholastic
Affairs: No Report.
8. Finance and Resources: Ms.
Lawson reported individuals should have received information regarding the
Distinguished Speaker Series.
Information will be coming out about the REU.
B. University Committees: Dr. Banish
encouraged people to check out the Library Website and the new Search Engines.
C. Officer Reports:
Parliamentarian: No Report.
Ombudsperson: No Report.
6. Senate Bill 305: Change in the Bylaws Concerning Senate Membership:
Dr. Karr explained Bill 305 and distributed information about the
history of the Bylaws and Faculty Senate Membership. He explained that things have changed
significantly in 30 years and the Bylaws should reflect those changes and be
brought in line with the times and with other universities. There was discussion regarding the bill and
the Faculty Senate and representation on the Senate.
The vote was 7 in favor, 17 opposed, and 6 abstentions. The bill failed at second reading.
7. QEP Presentation:
Dr.
Fix distributed a copy of the Executive Summary of the QEP. Dr. Fix reported we had our SACS off site
review in the fall. We received
comments. We responded with a focused
report and the QEP that was sent in at the same time. We have been able to recommend two reviewers
who have expertise in the area of QEP for the onsite review that will take
place
Right
now we have to get the information out.
We
will send the Executive Summary to all Faculty and Staff.
We
will print it in the Exponent.
We
will make pocket size cards for everyone.
We
will have a link to the Executive Summary and the ARC on the UAH website
We
will have it on WebCT
We
will place signs around campus
We
will meet with faculty in departments or colleges or both.
The
Faculty will be asked to talk to their classes and perhaps put something on
their syllabi.
There
was a point made that there were no faculty or students on the Oversight
Committee and that it had been suggested a couple of faculty be placed on the
Committee. This was accepted by Dr.
Franz.
There
was some discussion regarding the way the mentoring and tutoring will be
done. It was clarified the random
selection of students will be for the mentors.
The tutors will be assigned to class sections and all students in that
section will have the benefit of that tutor.
8.
Dr.
Reeves adjourned the meeting at