Report from
1.
Meeting of
Attending:
Reeves, Boyd, Schnell, Karr, Heikes, Burnett,
1.1
Faculty
Senate President’s Report
Dr. Boyd reported Melinda Lawson
and she went to the Board Meeting. The
Proposal for the DNP was approved and the name change for the
1.2
Reports from
Administration
No Reports.
1.3 Committee Items and Chair Reports
1.3.1 Undergraduate Curriculum Committee (Sharon George).
No Report.
1.3.2
Personnel
(
No Report.
1.3.3 Governance and Operations (Jeffrey Kulick).
Dr. Kulick reported he is collecting information on
the
1.3.4 Faculty and Student Development (Andrée Reeves).
No Report. Dr. Reeves was asked to look into a resource
for
1.3.5 Finance and Resources (John Burnett).
Dr. Burnett reported he met with
Dr. Delugach and he was a great source of information regarding the REU and the
Distinguished Speaker Lecture Series. He
still has to meet with Dr. J. Gregory and Dr. B. Vogler. The funding is there for the Distinguished
Speaker series but he needs to talk with Dr. Radonovich regarding the REU
funding and make the request for the $30,000.
He will contact
1.3.6
Undergraduate
Scholastic Affairs (
Dr. Heikes reported the Committee has two bills for review today on which they have been working—the NC Grading and Class attendance.
1.3.7 President-Elect—Kader
Frendi
No Report.
1.3.8 Ombudsperson—
Dr. Karr reported he has dealt with some issues this past year and he has a written report he is turning over to Peggy Bower for Confidential Keeping for the person who is the next ombudsperson. He has five issues brought to his attention and they are all still active.
1.3.9
Senate Bill
311—Undergraduate Scholastic Affairs (
Abolishing the NC Grade
Dr. Heikes brought the bill to the floor. The question was asked of whether the Committee had asked the students or SGA about changing this.
Dr. Schnell spoke in support of the NC Grade option. He pointed out that this started as a retention tool. He talked about the fact that Departments have the option of not using it and that the special cases could be dealt with on a case by case basis. He stated based on comments he received from his college it should continue.
There was some discussion regarding restricted it to those with a certain number of hours. Communicate the option of it being a departmental choice.
Dr. Heikes reported the faculty from Liberal Arts that communicated with her and those from other areas of campus indicated a concern for encouraging bad behavior and that it causes students to give up too quickly or too soon.
The vote for the bill was 4 in favor and 5 against at first reading. The Committee was asked to revisit the bill to incorporate some of the concerns raised in this meeting. They were asked to gather data regarding the NC grading.
The remainder of the bills were tabled for this meeting.
1.4.0 Proposal from Dr.
Dr.
Boyd brought a proposal from Dr.
1.4.1 The Agenda was set
for the