2000 Huntsville STC Salary Survey Report
November 2000

Purpose

The Huntsville Salary Survey was performed as a service to technical communication professionals and employers.

Interpreting This Report

The following special terms are used in this report:
  
Base: The total responses in a given category
  
Mean: The value computed by averaging the responses
  
Min: The lowest value reported in the category
  
Max: The highest value reported in the category

The survey solicits salary information categorically. For example, if a respondent earns $51, 475 per year, he or she selects the answer "50,001-55,000" from a multiple-choice list. Therefore, the Min and Max are reported as the midpoint of the lowest and highest selections.

The survey method is direct as opposed to random-sample. The survey is based on salary data for the year October 1999 through October 2000.

Compensation Analysis and Demographics

This report includes data that is appropriate for compensation analysis and data that is appropriate for demographic analysis. The two should not be confused. Compensation analysis is appropriate for a single job function. Demographic analysis includes data from all job functions.

Other Factors in Compensation

This report provides information sorted by commonly used categories. However, many qualitative factors can influence compensation: technical knowledge, the practices of a specific industry (semiconductor, software, medical), and so on. This report should be used as a tool, not an authority.

Acknowledgments

The Huntsville/North Alabama chapter of the Society for Technical Communication (STC) wishes to thank the following people: John Gough of the Austin STC for his assistance with the Huntsville/North Alabama Salary Survey and Report; and the UAH  students who conducted the survey, Tammy Callaway in 1999 and Christi Parker and Dauphne Rogers in 2000.


Demographic Analysis, Salaried Employees

Compensation Analysis by Job Function, Salaried Employees

Contracting Rates

Salaries of Technical Communicators by Education

Salaries of Male and Female Technical Communicators

Respondents by Job Function (pie chart)

Respondents by Education (pie chart)

Benefits (bar chart)