Michelle Vessel
Dr. Rose Norman
EH 540-3
13 July 2001
Paper Proposal: ‘You Looks Like Youse Yo’ Own Daughter’:
Figuring (In)fertility and Maternity
in Their Eyes Were Watching God
Although critical responses to Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God have focused extensively on both sexuality and images of fecundity in the text, analyses that fully address fertility and maternity in the novel are as strangely absent from the critical literature as the presumable fact of Janie’s reproductive capacity is from the text itself. Unlike Nella Larsen’s roughly contemporary novel Quicksand, Hurston not only seems to deny the notion that marriage is death for women, she also disrupts the traditional association of marriage with pregnancy/childbirth (McDowell xxi). It is unclear whether Hurston took this non-approach to Janie’s fertility in the novel as a means of disequating marriage and childbirth, or simply because pregnancy and maternity did not figure in the story she wanted to tell. However, the novel’s emphasis on fertility in nature and sexuality renders this textual absence particularly problematic.
The proposed paper will begin with an examination of the ample fertility imagery in the novel. Janie’s early conflation of fertility in nature, sexual desire, and marriage will be discussed, followed by the role that sexuality plays in each of her marriages. Then, the textual absence of Janie’s reproductive fertility will be addressed, as well as a discussion of whether this textual absence is evidence of the novel’s failed realism, as some critics have suggested, or a byproduct of the idealization of the world of the novel. A short discussion of the trope of textual absence or elision of conception and pregnancy in the works of several African American women writers will also be included.
Although I have not yet fully formulated the theoretical framework I will use to account for the problematic treatment of Janie’s fertility in the novel, the textual elements that I am planning to discuss will be the extended mule metaphor/imagery (with its implications of sterility) and the depiction of other maternal relationships in the novel (particularly those of Nanny and Leafy to both each other and to Janie). Finally, I will relate the treatment of maternity and fertility in the novel with the overarching theme of Janie’s quest for fulfillment/selfhood/voice/independence/embodiment.
Several extensive searches of the critical literature addressing Their Eyes have failed to reveal any full-length articles addressing the textual absence of Janie’s fertility. The articles listed below address various aspects of sexuality and sexual autonomy, marriage, and fertility imagery in the novel.
Works Cited/Consulted
Brogan, Jacqueline Vaught. "The Hurston/Walker/Vaughn Connection: Feminist Strategies in American Fiction."
Women's Studies 28.2 (1999): 185-201.duCille, Ann. "Stoning the Romance: Passion, Patriarchy, and the Modern Marriage Plot." The Coupling
Convention: Sex, Text and Tradition in Black Women’s Fiction. New York: Oxford UP, 1993. 110-142.Haurykiewicz, Julie A. "From Mules to Muliebrity: Speech and Silence in Their Eyes Were Watching God."
Southern Literary Journal 29.2 (Spring 1997): 45-61.Kayano, Yoshiko. "Burden, Escape, and Nature's Role: A Study of Janie's Development in Their Eyes Were Watching God." Publications of the Mississippi Philological Association (1998): 36-44. (ILL – not yet received)
Kodat, Catherine Gunther. "Biting the Hand that Writes You: Southern African-American Folk Narrative and the
Place of Women in Their Eyes Were Watching God." Haunted Bodies: Gender and Southern Texts. Eds. Anne Goodwyn Jones and Susan V. Donaldson. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1997. 319-42.McDowell, Deborah E. "Introduction." Quicksand and Passing. Ed. McDowell, Deborah E. New Brunswick, NJ
: Rutgers UP, 1986. ix-xxxv.